Paul Rouke - Usability Professional

Whilst on my train back from this future of usability event tonight, hosted by Bunnyfoot and E-consultancy, I wanted to share some of the key messages and findings that came out of both the questionnaire and from the speakers.

Ashley Friedlein, CEO of E-consultancy, opened the event – he started by talking about the change in terminology over his 10 years within the online user experience and usability field…

…going something along the lines of HCI – usability – user experience – customer experience – UCD (User centred design)

Ultimately its about putting users at the heart of your online marketing decisions, a statement which can’t be emphasised enough.

Another of Ashley’s industry comments was on the continued trend of emphasis placed on the acquisition of potential customers.

To brake this post up I thought now is a good time for a 1 liner from Ashley -

“Driving traffic to your website isn’t hard – you can simply pay for it.”

This is certainly true for businesses spending significant marketing budgets using the like of Google Adwords.

But as Ashley pointed out, the continuing rise of cost in ppc and with affiliates looking to change their charging models, this will only increase the chunk of marketing spend that the acquisition area will take.

In contrast, what smarter businesses (who are looking to better increase ROI and conversions) are realising more and more is that improving the user experience and usability of their websites can provide much greater increases in conversion and retention rates.

People will spend longer on, convert more often and refer on a site with a good user experience which is intuitive and enjoyable to interact with.

Ashley feels that whilst usability is now being considered much more, looking further ahead he is also interested in the next level of user experience studies and online marketing.

This assumes that any usability flaws have been fixed, and now it is time to look at areas such as persuasion architecture and behavioural analysis. Ultimately a better understanding of what triggers online users to interact with an interface and pursue certain journeys, which can therefore allow the website owners to adapt the messaging/tone of voice/allocation of real estate to target different users.

All excellent snippets of views from a businessman whom I have much admiration for, not only for the business he has built in e-consultancy but also for his willingness to assist me in various aspects of establishing both my user experience agency but also me personally in the online arena (part of which is this blog that you are reading).

Next up was Linus Gregoriadis (Head of Research – E-consultancy) who provided a walkthrough of the questionnaire findings and what this means for the Internet now and in the future

Key highlights of the report were as follows:

• Over 700 respondants
• From what I recall this was made up of around 350 client side, 200 agencies/specialist usability consultants and the remaining as other individuals working within the online arena
• Usability is beginning to make a dent in the overall budgets of redesign projects
• Over the next 12 months across all areas of marketing investment, such as seo, ppc, affiliate marketing, mobile and usability, usability was considered the area whuch will see the biggest % increase in marketing spend, followed closely by seo and ppc – (to refer back to Ashley’s views which I share completely, until businesses place more strategy (And budget!) on the actual user experience they are effectively hemoragging money sending vasts numbers of visitors to a site which isn’t founded on UCD (user centred design).
• When asked where the responsibility lies when it comes to the usability and user experience of a project, over 70% confirmed that in-house teams and or/individuals held this responsibility. This left around 15% who use external expert ux agencies and consultants, along with another 10% who work alongside specialist agencies

Finally for this brief overview, the top 3 results for a business embracing the possibilities of having usability and user experience at the core of a project were as follows:

1. Increased brand perception
2. Increased brand loyalty
3. Increased conversion rates

The full report is due to be made available shortly at which stage I will provide a link.

In closing I haven’t touched on the redesigned Visit London website which is due live on the 5th July – this project featured UCD at its core and through the course of the project, using user testing and eye tracking to name but a few methods, the head of user experience at Visit London Jeremy Wilmott and his team have been able to ensure that the relaunched site is well positioned to provide visitors with an exceptional user experience. As with any such large scale redesign project on-going usability evaluations will ensure the website continues to meet its wide variety of visitor needs.

As I make my way back north this evening following this event, taking stock of both this assessment of the future of usability as well as my own knowledge and experiences in this arena, I am relishing the opportunities across all industry sectors which my specialist online user experience agency PRWD will continue to become a key player, both in forward thinking, intuitive web development projects but also in providing businesses with services such as user testing, information architecture analysis and solutions, eye tracking, behavioural pattern defining and persuasion architecture.

All in all an excellent evenings discussion and industry analysis, I hope you’ve enjoyed my summary!

Around April 2007 I was delighted to be asked to contribute to a Web Design Best Practice Guide which Dave Chaffey and E-consultancy were producing.

The guide was to provide a regularly updated, single point of reference covering best practice approaches for all the topics that anyone involved with website design needs to do an effective job.

Due to the sheer scope of the guide, I was asked to provide contributions, advice and case study examples on specific topics within the guide suited to my experiences and expertise.

The areas I contributed to were as follows:

• Section 3. User-centred web design process
• Section 4. Web usability
• Section 6. Information architecture
• Section 7. Visual Design

The finalised guide is more than 350 pages in length, which is considered one of the most comprehensive reports of its kind available.

You can view full details of the content of the guide within the best practice guides area at E-consultancy, entitled Web Design Best Practice Guide.

I strongly recommend you at least downloading the sample best pracice guide which may well encourage to purchase and download the full guide.

Finally I must add a thankyou to Dave Chaffey (whom I’ve recently taken part in a Q and A session on Findability for online design and marketing, particularly for e-commerce sites) and Chris Lake, editor at E-consultancy, for in the 1st instance requesting my input to this huge project but also for adding in a special mention within the contributors section at the back of the full guide!

I’d love to get your feedback on the best practice guide if you choose to download it, or share any other comments on this posting.

Taking a different view of the upcoming FA Cup Final between Chelsea v Man United (come on the reds!), following the relaunch of the Manchester United website in 2006, which has since received multiple award nominations, I was interested to see how Chelsea are promoting themselves online, both in football and commercial terms, in comparison.

Surprising to say the least, but the current Chelsea FC website is a fully flash driven site, providing an ultimately different user experience to Manchester United.

As expected and required for a variety of reasons including search engine optimisation and accessibility, a text only version of the site has been provided.

Having spent some time exploring the Chelsea website, as I’m already fairly familiar with the Man United website in terms of information architecture, user experience and ultimately the user experience that has won them awards, I am beginning to un-cover some fairly significant user experience issues which can only be detrimental the overall Chelsea brand experience and online revenue generation currently.

Very top level, but below are some of my initial user experience comments, in no particular order (**editors note – as I have been analysing the Chelsea website to produce this post I have realised that I need to get back to paid work, so whereas the following list and this post in general could be alot longer, I had to hold off going into this subject too deeply!):

• non-caching flash homepage – the main flash movie that you view on the homepage (once it finishes loading, which even on an 8MB broadband connection feels quite frustrating) hasn’t been coded to allow for caching of the flash file, so therefore each time a user wishes to return to the homepage, (perhaps as they are feeling lost – but that is another matter) they have to wait for the full movie to load. To compound matters, viewing the site in Firefox actually made the flash file hang at some stages, requiring a browser refresh.
• mixed navigational methods – although one of my key recommendations for large, particularly e-commerce websites, is to provide users with alternative ways to navigate a site based on their browsing preferences ie. using the search facility, exploring the promoted products/information and navigating through the main navigational routes, the implementation of some of Chelsea’s browsing features, such as the zoom functionality in particular and the discovery of the sidebar sitemap, ensure that rather than generating confidence in the user, confusion is brought on followed by frustration at trying to understand how the site is working
• fixed site size, both horizontally and vertically – by using a full fixed width flash movie to display the site, a user has to continually click inside small internal frames to scroll through the content within the frame. By the nature of the site, articles and reports can be extensive, which requires significant amount of scrolling, although unfortunately not by the standard means of scrolling the browser window
• poor quality imagery – although the site isn’t actually selling products, the quality of the imagery used throughout the site is detrimental to the overall appeal of the site, as it provides a much less professional representation of the club and its sponsors to a visitor
• non-clickable areas appearing to be clickable – some of the ‘hit areas’ within the site have been incorrectly included within the flash movies, which result in the mouse cursor changing to signify a link when in fact the area isn’t clickable

What Manchester United are doing well from a user experience aspect

1. a structured, consistent and professional presentation of information
2. a standard but ultimately intuitive navigation and information architecture
3. a polished visual style which provides fans and business users with the appropriate levels of brand and club awareness and information
4. use of interactive flash where it can enhance the user experience ie. a virtual tour of Old Trafford
5. a highly visible and consistent search facility, a must for such a content rich and deep website

What Manchester United are doing well from a commercial aspect

1. constantly integrated promotion of commercial channels such as MU TV, MU Mobile, MU Pics, MU Finance
2. constant promotion and visibility of the register/login/account details functionality – ultimately by encouraging fans to register Man Utd can tailor content and offers accordingly, providing much more commercial value to the site
3. an integrated visual approach combining the brand and the sponsors
4. an overall professional visual style which caters for both the fans and corporate requirements, which ultimately reflects well on Manchester United as a commercial business

My recommendations to the online brand manager at Chelsea FC

If I was sat in front of the online brand/marketing manager for Chelsea, I would recommend a range of actions which would certainly help Chelsea focus their current online brand marketing.

1. carry out user testing, with a range of users such as casual supporters, die-hard supporters, corporate hospitality users, the press, visually impaired and more
2. obtain a heuristic evaluation of the website (view a 1 page overview of what is a hueristic evaluation and how it works)
3. develop persona’s of typical users of the site, concentrating on what key areas they are likely to be looking for within the site
4. carry out card sorting exercises to gain an insight into how actual users expect to locate different pieces of information throughout the site
5. based on the above points, consider testing a different, user centred design solution which would aim to vastly increase the usability and overall user experience of the site

In my view, although such a user centred design project will have resource and cost implications, by really focussing the site on the user, I would predict Chelsea FC would experience significant :

• increases in page views
• increases in length of visit
• increases in natural search traffic
• increases in uptake of commercial channels (betting, mobile, TV etc)
• increases in visitor loyalty, especially if user registration is introduced (similar to ONE United)
• decreases in visitor drop-out rates
• good press regarding the site and its usability and accessibility

Final thoughts

Comparing the 2 online presences currently, although Chelsea have made significant on the pitch strides to rival Manchester United, the current online battle is most certainly being won by Manchester United, who appear to be harnessing most of the commercial opportunities that can lead from an immersive and intuitive user experience.

Ultimately results on the pitch will always make the headlines (and provide the marketing) for a football club, but I look forward to seeing whether Chelsea will look to online as a marketing channel with which they can more effectively promote the club and the brand to what is now a worldwide audience.

I’d be interested to hear any feedback to this post, as well as finding out if anyone has more examples of potentially harmful rather than positive user experiences amongst football clubs and other sporting brands online?

As a business and personal user of Google Analytics, along with being a user interface designer, it is great to now be using the new Google Analytics interface, which has been given a significant user interface redesign.

The amount of data that is recorded by Google Analytics and is therefore made available through the interface is vast, which makes both the information architecture and user experience of this interface critical to the software’s success.

For SME businesses I would thoroughly recommend considering implementing Google Analytics into your site, especially if you currently have no user friendly and multi-leveled way of accessing statistics to your site visitor behaviour.

There is already significant articles on the subject of the new Google Analytics interface, so rather than re-inventing the wheel below are links to my most relevant and useful articles reviewing the new interface:

• Avinash Kaushik, an independent consultant and now working for Google as an Analytics Evangelist, provides his view on the 1st 5 things you should do when using v2
• 27 Features That Make Google Analytics Best of Breed on Mashable
• The Google Analytics official blog

Hats off to the user interface designers and information architects responsible for the new interface!

A recent post on E-consultancy entitled Five reasons why you should embrace Usability provides the following reasons as to why businesses, especially true for businesses operating e-commerce websites, can’t ignore the challenge of making their online experience usable. Instead businesses should embrace usability:

1. You seriously can’t afford not to

Repeat: you cannot afford to ignore the user experience. Especially if you sell online. Or if you can afford to then you aren’t optimising your business performance. It’s that simple.

2. User experience can be more important than brand and price

It can be argued that the user experience is more important than both brand and price. What use is a brand like Gap when there is no on-site search tool on Gap.com?

What use is discounting prices when your checkout process is poor and haemorrhages prospective buyers? Conversely, a startup with no known brand and average prices can get on the map by being more user-friendly than established competition.

3. Gain the competitive advantage

There is a bigger picture here: a higher than average conversion rate will ultimately help you to outbid competitors on Google Adwords.

Usability studies can help you convert as many prospective customers as possible. Again, with Google Adwords in mind, if you are paying to attract these prospects then it becomes even more important to realize a return on your (paid search) investment.

Likewise, if your site converts well, then affiliates will like sending traffic to your site as the earnings per click (EPC) they get from you (how much money they make on average per referral they send you) will be better than your competition.

4. Focus on web standards

Usability studies will test your website for errors, as well as problem zones. Error-free code is important for various reasons, not least your Google rankings.

5. You are already spending on design

Websites should be constantly tweaked for optimum business results, but even if you only update your site every couple of years you will still spend a lot of money, so make sure you spend it wisely.

Invest 5%-20% of your design budget on usability to be sure that your new design is in line with what your users want. Usability first, changes second.

My thoughts on why businesses can’t ignore usability

Alongside the comments above, introducing usability into an existing website, by way of either small, subtle changes, for instance to the visibility of key site tools, or by carrying out a complete expert usability site critique, through a complete cycle of card sorting, information architecture, wireframing, prototyping, user testing, eye tracking and carrying out focus groups (a non definitive list) businesses can achieve clear increases in visitor conversion rates, shopping basket sizes, registrations, applications, newsletter sign-ups and other specific goals which the business is targeting for their website.

Visitors experiencing good usability on an e-commerce site will:

1. be more likely to complete a shopping process
2. be more willing to browse additional ranges of products that wouldn’t normally be looking for
3. enjoy their experience and be more inclined to revisit the site in future
4. have confidence in the ways in which they can find the products they are looking for (ie. by an intuitive navigation system, by a clear and helpful search facility, by special seasonal specific promotions, plus viewing related products whilst that are browsing the ranges)
5. feel in control of their browsing at all times, avoiding the feeling of being lost and having to go back to the homepage and start again
6. recommend the site to friends and colleagues who share similar shopping styles, therefore providing the business with free publicity
7. be more receptive to marketing communications from the business

And my final benefit (for this post) to a businesses providing good online usability…

Customers will visit and shop from the site again and again, as it is somewhere where they feel comfortable and in control, which helps develop trust in the brand. Visitors are always more likely to remember a site they have enjoyed using than one which confused or frustrated them.